Penny, since you took the time to write this list concerning my posts, I feel obliged to respond, hopefully in a way that does not seem adversarial.
1. “I have issues with channelers in an age of V2K. All of them. I see no reason to listen to people who are repeating what the CIA is telling them over wifi.”
I agree, which is why I always try to determine if someone is hearing telepathically, through an alien implant, or via V2K CIA tech.
As I’m sure you know, all methods are real but different with one thing uniting them. The receiver can be deceived as to who is really speaking to them.
That’s why I ask questions that might help me determine the source for a particular person’s information.
2. I too feel anger and sadness over the death of Steven Chu.
3. “I have issues with I lived in a MILITARY in 3D physical space and people want me to make religious statements. Do you ask Generals to give you religious answers?”
My experience in the military was that most of the people I met would definitely not have been my first choice for getting answers to theological questions.
4. “Having lived in a MILITARY SITUATION, there are no 'good guys' out there. There are only varying degrees of self-absorbed potential hostiles. Treat them like used car salesmen.”
My experience back in the 1960s was that most of my military comrades were basically good people, who didn’t have much understanding of the big picture about politics, metaphysics, or aliens.
That was the United States military. I’m not surprised if you had a different experience serving in a Nazis organization like the Nacht Waffen.
5. “You have come to MY website and are hounding me about another speaker who I have already given my opinion of her pronouncements. You sound to me like you should be on HER website instead of mine. AKA, you are being rude to me in my house…”
I don’t consider asking honest questions to be rude, just inappropriate, if they are directed to someone who will be triggered by them.
If I had realized my questions would provoke so much upset, I wouldn’t have asked them.
6. “I have 5 years of public record, most is on my YT channel. If you can't be bothered to watch that, why should I be bothered to listen to your religious leader?”
I watched videos about you before coming to your website. And I’m grateful to Rita for suggesting the ones she did, which I’ve been watching.
BTW, I don’t follow any religious leaders.
7. “Just because I'm public and available does not give you the right to interrogate me because can't make up your mind if I'm telling the truth or not. Your attitude is calling me a liar.”
I never called you a liar, and I didn’t arrive on your site disbelieving your story. In fact, I came looking for information to help me decide whether to believe reports from others like Daryl and Elena, who claim that “white hats” will prevail and usher in a great future.
As for interrogating you, I’ve already apologized if my questions sounded adversarial.
FYI, some in your community welcome my questions. For example, here’s a response from Tony to some tough questions I asked him in our Patreon chat yesterday:
TONY - “I love these questions. I like the hard questions. That’s what this is for. That’s why we’re doing this. But I’ll tell you it’s much harder than any interview I ever did.”